Skip to content

Decrease in USDT Market Capitalization Observed Post MiCA Implementation

On December 30, the EU's MiCA regulation for digital assets took force, aligning with a decrease in USDT's market capitalization, which previously exceeded $141 billion.

Decrease in USDT's Total Market Capitalization Observed After MiCA Regulation Enforcement
Decrease in USDT's Total Market Capitalization Observed After MiCA Regulation Enforcement

Decrease in USDT Market Capitalization Observed Post MiCA Implementation

The European Union's (EU) MiCA regulation for digital assets, which came into effect on December 30, has brought about significant changes for stablecoin issuers, particularly large players such as Tether. The new rules impose stringent requirements, effectively excluding non-compliant stablecoins from regulated European exchanges and demanding heavy reserve and licensing requirements.

MiCA mandates that stablecoin issuers obtain a unified license valid across all 27 EU member states and hold at least 60% of their reserves in EU-based banks. This aim is to increase oversight and consumer protection, but it raises concerns about increased systemic risk to European banks if large stablecoin redemption waves occur.

Tether, one of the largest stablecoin issuers, has so far chosen not to apply for MiCA compliance, leading to de-listings of its USDT stablecoin in the EU. Major exchanges such as Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and Crypto.com have removed USDT trading pairs for European users. This decision has created liquidity fragmentation in Europe, pushing users towards unregulated or offshore platforms and forcing crypto projects to find alternatives that comply with MiCA standards.

The key implications of MiCA for the stablecoin market, especially large issuers like Tether, include:

  • Market Access Restriction: Non-MiCA-compliant stablecoins cannot be traded on regulated EU exchanges, significantly reducing their European market share.
  • Operational and Compliance Costs: Issuers must meet strict licensing, reserve auditing, and transaction volume caps, raising barriers to market entry and ongoing operations.
  • Risk Concentration in EU Banking: Mandating large reserve deposits in EU banks could increase systemic risk during redemption surges, possibly threatening smaller or medium-sized banks.
  • Shift in Market Dynamics: European users and projects may migrate to MiCA-compliant stablecoins (e.g., euro-backed e-money tokens) or face liquidity challenges, fundamentally reshaping stablecoin preference and usage in the EU.
  • Strategic Relocation: Tether’s unwillingness to comply led to withdrawal from the EU market and relocating headquarters out of Europe to singular markets like El Salvador.

In August, Tether's CEO Paolo Ardoino criticised MiCA, describing it as a "systemic risk" not only to stablecoins but also to the banking system. Uldis Teraudkalns, Chief Revenue Officer at Paybis, predicts that MiCA will transform the EU crypto landscape with far-reaching effects. Teraudkalns speculates that compliance costs could push out some companies, regardless of size, from the EU market.

Despite the challenges, Tether remains financially robust, with projections of earning around $10 billion in profits this year. However, USDT's market capitalization dropped from over $141 billion mid-month to approximately $137.5 billion. Some European crypto exchanges, such as Coinbase Europe, have delisted USDT and five other stablecoins due to regulatory uncertainty.

Jurisdictions close to the EU, such as the UK and Switzerland, could potentially benefit depending on their regulatory developments. Agnė Lingė of WeFi stated that compliance with MiCA could be economically burdensome for large stablecoin issuers like Tether. However, Lingė does not foresee significant financial consequences for Tether due to a potential EU exit.

In conclusion, MiCA enforces a robust regulatory framework designed to increase consumer protection and market stability but at the cost of excluding major stablecoins like Tether from EU regulated trading unless they adapt. This creates market fragmentation, raises systemic banking risks, and shifts liquidity towards compliant stablecoins, marking a pivotal change in the European stablecoin landscape.

Read also:

Latest