NFTs associated with the project A Kid Called Beast face accusations for removing wallets from the approved whitelist
In the ever-evolving world of web3, a new player has emerged, positioning itself as the 'Disney' of the digital realm - A Kid Called Beast (AKCB). This 3D augmented reality NFT project, based on Ethereum, aims to bring together physical and digital art interactions, art, fashion, music, and technology.
However, the project has found itself under scrutiny on NFT Twitter, with a heated debate surrounding the integrity and fairness of its allowlist process. The controversy revolves around allegations of favoritism and manipulation in the distribution of allowlist spots, as well as concerns about transparency in the decisions made by AKCB co-founder, Rafsby.
Accusations and Allegations
Rafsby is accused of cherry-picking from potential collaborator Resaang's communities, leading to a collapsed potential collaboration. Additionally, Twitter user Hypno.ETH accuses Rafsby of spreading false information, claiming that Rafsby said there was a filter for people using bots and only 9813 wallets were loaded on the allowlist. However, Hypno.eth states that the wallets are still loaded on the AKCB smart contract, suggesting that Rafsby may have allegedly rugged around 20,000 followers for allowlist spots.
Some users from the @DegenPasses community claim that AKCB previously rugged allowlist spots in August. These accusations have led to debates on social media and NFT forums, with some users defending the project and denying any rug pull allegations.
A Divided Community
The situation has sparked discussions about governance practices within the AKCB project and the accountability of its leadership. Some community members have expressed dissatisfaction, feeling excluded or treated unfairly. This has led to a divided opinion among NFT Twitter users, with some viewing the controversy as an example of NFT influencer entitlement, while others see it as a rug pull.
Innovation and Potential
Despite the controversy, AKCB innovates by offering a human-utility solution and unique art experiences. The project aims to bridge the gap between the physical and digital worlds, offering a platform for artists, creators, and collectors to interact and collaborate.
For those interested in learning more about the AKCB project, more information can be found on the AKCB official website. As the controversy continues to unfold, it's important to stay informed by checking the latest official statements from the AKCB team or credible community sources for the most current information.
As of now, AKCB remains a top 15 NFT project in the Ethereum ecosystem, and rising. The future of the project remains to be seen, with the community closely watching developments and hoping for a resolution to the ongoing controversy.
Ethereum wallet holders have expressed concerns about the integrity of AKCB's allowlist process, as Twitter user Hypno.ETH alleges Rafsby, the co-founder of AKCB, manipulated the distribution of allowlist spots. Moreover, some users claim that AKCB previously rugged allowlist spots in August, leading to a divided opinion among NFT Twitter users, with critics viewing this as an instance of NFT influencer entitlement or a rug pull, while supporters see the project as innovative, offering a human-utility solution and unique art experiences in the intersection of physical and digital art, fashion, music, and technology.
