Skip to content

Shadow Shares: a lesser-known type of equity not handed out directly to employees, but which can reap significant rewards under specific conditions.

Non-issued stocks, often called 'phantom' or 'shadow stocks', serve as a method to motivate and compensate employees without actual equities being distributed, thus avoiding stockholder dilution. Such plans can prove advantageous for both startups and their workforce, as explained below.

Shadows Stocks: An unseen financial instrument under the spotlight
Shadows Stocks: An unseen financial instrument under the spotlight

Shadow Shares: a lesser-known type of equity not handed out directly to employees, but which can reap significant rewards under specific conditions.

In the dynamic world of business, communication platforms like Facebook, Messenger, Twitter, Pinterest, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, and Email play a crucial role in connecting companies with their customers and employees. However, another important aspect that needs attention is the funding of these startups. This article aims to discuss the legal issues in fundraising for new businesses, and provide a guide to equity compensation and tax implications for startup employees, with a focus on Phantom Stock Plans.

What are Phantom Stock Plans?

Phantom Stock Plans offer employees economic benefits linked to company stock value without granting actual ownership rights. Unlike traditional stock option plans that provide employees the right to purchase real equity, Phantom Stock Plans provide a more abstract form of compensation.

Pros and Cons of Phantom Stock for Startups and Employees

For Startups

  • Pros: Phantom Stock Plans avoid dilution of ownership and control since no real shares are issued. They also have less regulatory complexity and lower compliance costs compared to issuing real equity. Flexible plan design allows tailored incentives linked to company performance or specific triggers.
  • Cons: Phantom Stock payouts are typically taxed as ordinary income when paid, potentially higher than capital gains tax. The company needs cash liquidity to pay the phantom stock value upon vesting or triggering events. Enforcement of payouts can be more legally complex as it relies on contract law rather than shareholder rights.

For Employees

  • Pros: Employees receive benefits similar to equity appreciation without owning shares or dealing with shareholder responsibilities. Cash payout at vesting or event provides a tangible reward. Avoids risk associated with holding actual stock, such as dilution or loss of value without liquidity.
  • Cons: No true ownership—no voting rights or dividends, limiting influence and some benefits of equity holders. Payouts are taxed as ordinary income rather than potentially more favorable capital gains tax. No ability to sell or transfer phantom units since they are contractual rights, not securities.

Comparison to Traditional Stock Options

| Aspect | Phantom Stock Plans | Traditional Stock Option Plans | |-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| | Ownership | No real equity ownership, no voting rights | Right to buy actual stock, leading to ownership | | Dilution | No dilution of founder/owner shares | Can dilute existing ownership when options exercised | | Regulation | Governed mainly by employment/contract law | Subject to securities laws, registration, and reporting | | Taxation | Ordinary income tax upon payout | Potential for capital gains tax if favorable conditions met | | Liquidity | Typically cash payout; requires company cash flow | Employee may hold shares, subject to sale restrictions | | Employee control | No voting or control rights | Voting rights attached after exercising options | | Flexibility | Highly flexible in structuring triggers and payouts | More standardized; tied to stock purchase rights | | Complexity & Cost | Lower legal and accounting costs | Higher compliance costs, especially in public companies |

Phantom Stock Plans are especially attractive for startups wanting to align employee incentives to company performance while avoiding shareholder dilution and complex legal compliance. However, they impose cash payout obligations and do not give employees ownership benefits. Traditional stock options offer potential upside through actual equity ownership but involve dilution and greater regulatory complexity.

In sum, Phantom Stock Plans are a flexible, ownership-light incentive tool suited for startups managing control and cash flow, whereas stock options provide employees with potential capital gains through real equity but carry higher compliance and ownership complexities.

Additional Considerations

  • Phantom stock plans may or may not provide for dividends.
  • Phantom stock is a plan that rewards employees without issuing actual stock.
  • Receiving real shares is taxable income at the time of grant.
  • Phantom Equity allows these individuals to have a stake in the success of the company without actually owning any shares.
  • The payout at the time of company sale is tied to the market value of the company's stock.

[1] Investopedia: Phantom Stock [2] Forbes: The Pros And Cons Of Phantom Stock [3] Nolo: Phantom Stock: An Alternative to Stock Options [4] Business News Daily: Phantom Stock: What It Is and How It Works

  1. Startups can opt for Phantom Stock Plans as a way to provide economic benefits tied to company stock value without granting actual ownership rights, thereby avoiding shareholder dilution and reducing regulatory complexity.
  2. Employees receiving Phantom Stock benefits enjoy potentially similar appreciation advantages to equity holders without bearing shareholder responsibilities, though they miss out on voting rights and dividends, and payouts are taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gains tax.

Read also:

    Latest