Skip to content

Top CISA Leaders Resign Amidst Ongoing Purge

Many leaders from the operating divisions and regional offices of the agency are departing or planning to depart this month, in line with the Trump administration's assertive campaign for government reduction.

High-level departures persist at CISA as the purge carries on
High-level departures persist at CISA as the purge carries on

Top CISA Leaders Resign Amidst Ongoing Purge

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is currently experiencing a significant shake-up in its leadership, with several top officials either departing or planning to leave this month. This wave of departures, which includes regional directors and division heads, has raised concerns about the agency's operational stability and its ability to maintain vital partnerships.

According to reports by The Washington Post, the departures of key figures such as Region 2 Director John Durkin, Region 4 Director Jay Gamble, Region 5 Director Alex Joves, Deputy Director Kathy Young from Region 6, Region 7 Director Phil Kirk, and Region 10 Director Patrick Massey, among others, could potentially impact the efficiency and strategic clarity of CISA's partnerships with various entities, including critical infrastructure operators, private security firms, foreign allies, state governments, and local emergency managers.

The current leadership landscape at CISA is marked by interim arrangements and ongoing transitions. Madhu Gottumukkala, formerly the deputy undersecretary for cybersecurity, is serving as acting director, following the departure of previous leadership. Jeff Conklin, formerly the chief security officer (CSO) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has been appointed as CISA’s CSO, and Casie Antalis, previously a senior official in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has been named program director for the Joint Cyber Coordination Group (JCCG).

However, the lack of a Senate-confirmed director and the recent departure of senior executives could create uncertainty and reduce institutional memory, impacting the agency’s ability to maintain continuity in its core functions and long-term initiatives. The loss of expertise and institutional knowledge at CISA, as expressed by Suzanne Spaulding, who led CISA's predecessor wing, could potentially weaken vital government-industry partnerships, potentially limiting the agency’s effectiveness in addressing cybersecurity threats.

By the end of May, five out of six operational divisions and six out of ten regional offices at CISA will be without their top leaders. This has led to anxiety about the future of CISA, with an anonymous CISA employee expressing concern about the high number of senior departures, stating that there is a lot of anxiety about when the cuts and departures will finally stop and the agency can move forward.

In addition to the departures of key officials, Blair Duncan, the chief human capital officer, left CISA on May 2. Steve Harris, the acting head of the Infrastructure Security Division, left on May 16. Trent Frazier, the acting head of the Stakeholder Engagement Division, left on May 2. Val Cofield, the chief strategy officer, and Tarek Abboushi, the chief financial officer, will leave CISA on May 30.

The departures could also affect CISA's nationwide presence, partners' awareness of its services, and its reputation as a reliable source of expertise and support. Juan Arratia, the chief contracting officer, left CISA on May 16. Spaulding states that the departure of leaders across the country who work with critical infrastructure owners and operators will leave the nation less secure and resilient.

As CISA navigates these transitions, it remains to be seen how the agency will maintain its operational stability and continue to foster its crucial partnerships in the face of these leadership changes.

In the wake of these departures, concerns about CISA's ability to maintain partnerships with critical infrastructure operators, private security firms, foreign allies, state governments, and local emergency managers are heightened, potentially impacting the efficiency and strategic clarity of these partnerships.

The loss of key figures such as Regional Directors and Division Heads could weaken vital government-industry partnerships, potentially limiting CISA's effectiveness in addressing cybersecurity threats, and negatively impacting its nationwide presence, partners' awareness of its services, and its reputation as a reliable source of expertise and support.

Read also:

    Latest